In
the post-colonial era, many of those living in rural areas of the Middle East
and North Africa have and continued to move to urban areas in pursuit of
employment. While more women are in the labor force nowadays than in decades
past (R&W), those women who are willing and able to work are in competition
with men for available jobs. With regard to states' choices in health and
education spending, MENA states' failure to aggressively promote policies that
decrease fertility rates may be part of the reason for the massive percentage
number of Middle Easterners under age 20 (R&W) , the physical cost of which
is born by women. If curriculum is gendered as Sonbol asserts, then women are
being handicapped during formative educational years. Additionally, women in
countries such as Jordan cannot work without the authorization of a male
guardian. Even if they can work, they are discouraged from taking jobs that are
dangerous or involve night work (Sonbol). Perhaps this is part of the
explanation for why their labor-force participation rate is lowest for any
region of the world (R&W). As of 2000, women have entered the labor force
at an increasing rate. This is encouraging; however, it will also exert greater
pressure on current labor markets in addition to the growing population of
young unemployed males and on future labor markets given the fact that half of
the region's population is under 20 years old (R&W).
I'm
not entirely familiar with gender issues in Europe so I'll limit my discussion
on this subject to women in the United States. Given a general lack of
gender-specific schooling options in the U.S. I would find it difficult to
assert that the state's choices in educational spending affect American women
the way that they affect some women in the Middle East and North Africa. In at
least one respect - the subsidization of oral contraceptives through the
Affordable Healthcare Act - the United States' choices in health spending have
increased women's access to health care in recent years relative to the efforts
made by governments in MENA nations that I am aware of. Additionally, the
American does not classify women as the property of their male relatives as the
Jordanian legal system does with its female citizens; however, that is not to
say that American women don't also face non-legal pressures regarding their
dual roles as potential employees and mothers. For example, last year Google
announced a new employee benefit allowing women to have their eggs frozen at
the company's expense. While a free medical procedure may seem on its face to
be a thoughtful and progressive offer, some speculate that this is Google's way
of encouraging female employees to delay motherhood in favor of devoting as
much time as possible to the company. Shaming and violence toward girls and women based on actual or alleged
sexual promiscuity exists in both regions. Women in both MENA countries and the
U.S. are confronted with challenges stemming from institutions' perception of
what it means to be a woman, albeit on somewhat different levels given their
respective dominant cultural values.
With
respect to political representation, Tunisia's new constitution does contain
articles that support the ethical treatment of women and children. Tunisia has
a higher rate of women represented in its parliament than the U.S. does in
Congress - a gap which may continue to grow given Article 45 of the new
Tunisian constitution's stated
goal to "achieve the principle of parity between men and women in elected
councils." According to the article posted by Prof. Hardig, Tunisia's
higher parliamentary representation of women relative to the region's other
legislatures may have something to do with a parity clause first utilized in
the 2011 elections that required equal representation of men and women on the
electoral list - a policy that I am not aware exists in other MENA countries.
Meherzia Labidi, vice-president of the assembly from the governing Islamist
Ennahda party's assertion that women "survived despotism and dictatorship
due to female resistance, while the men were in exile or in prison" is a
difficult one to quantify when searching for an explanation of women's
relatively high representation. It may be that women's participation in
political spheres is more widely accepted in Tunisia than in other MENA
nations. Tunisian women
gained the right to vote nearly 60 years ago and also have the right to an
abortion, indicating that the Tunisian government, if not the Tunisian
people, has endorsed the inclusion of women in decision-making more quickly
and extensively than some of its neighbors.
A very interesting aspect to all of this is the proven impact state policy has on cultural perceptions on gender equality. Take my own country, Sweden, for instance (a somewhat dated, but interesting article can be found here: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/10/world/europe/10iht-sweden.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0). The policies pursued by the state have led to a cultural shift in what is meant by 'masculinity' - I have had many a conversation with self-professed liberals here in the US who still find it strange to think that the father and mother could share equal time at home with the baby. Policies on paternity and maternity leave has a direct impact on closing the gender pay gap, for sure, but it also has a direct impact on cultural norms.
ReplyDelete